Difference between revisions of "Talk:RoundTable"

From WikiManual
Jump to: navigation, search
(Endy Talk bout RoundTable)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Glad you liked the opening line :) I thought it'd be pretty funny to reference our titles at DB :)
 
Glad you liked the opening line :) I thought it'd be pretty funny to reference our titles at DB :)
 +
 +
relagating this to the back room. ;)
 +
 +
:The bullet points are long term goals I am reaching towards.  In the end I want to create a
 +
:system when multicellular critters evolve from single celled animals.  In looking
 +
:at the Cambrian explosion, some key factors seemed to have developed all at once:
 +
 +
::arrgh! it is this sort of 'imposition' that i object to. attempts to replicate some idea
 +
::that we entertain as to what life is or isn't ... rather than simply aid/allow the alife/evo
 +
::sim to 'discover' what it will! now if we want to play god and create life in our own image ...
 +
::fine ... but that's creationism, not evolution!
 +
::this seems to me to be just another form of anthropomorphism ...
 +
::which i think should be avoided if the goal is to produce an ALife/Evo sim ...
 +
::rather than someting 'pretty' and some sort of game. {{User:Griz/sig}} 09:43, 25 Oct 2005 (MST)
 +
 +
:#Sexual Reproduction
 +
:#Pooling of genetic resources into a nucleus and chromosomes (important for the above)
 +
:#Some more I forget off the top of my head.

Revision as of 11:43, 25 October 2005

Glad you liked the opening line :) I thought it'd be pretty funny to reference our titles at DB :)

relagating this to the back room. ;)

The bullet points are long term goals I am reaching towards. In the end I want to create a
system when multicellular critters evolve from single celled animals. In looking
at the Cambrian explosion, some key factors seemed to have developed all at once:
arrgh! it is this sort of 'imposition' that i object to. attempts to replicate some idea
that we entertain as to what life is or isn't ... rather than simply aid/allow the alife/evo
sim to 'discover' what it will! now if we want to play god and create life in our own image ...
fine ... but that's creationism, not evolution!
this seems to me to be just another form of anthropomorphism ...
which i think should be avoided if the goal is to produce an ALife/Evo sim ...
rather than someting 'pretty' and some sort of game. Griztalk 09:43, 25 Oct 2005 (MST)
  1. Sexual Reproduction
  2. Pooling of genetic resources into a nucleus and chromosomes (important for the above)
  3. Some more I forget off the top of my head.